Exploring tensions of using interpretative phenomenological analysis in a domain with conflicting cultural practices

Adam Kirn; James L. Huff; Allison Godwin; Monique Ross; Cheryl Cass

doi:10.1080/14780887.2018.1563270

Exploring tensions of using interpretative phenomenological analysis in a domain with conflicting cultural practices

Adam Kirn
, James L. Huff
, Allison Godwin
, Monique Ross
, Cheryl Cass

Harding University

University of Nevada, Reno
Purdue University
Florida International University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Original language	American English
Journal	Qualitative Research in Psychology
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2018.1563270
State	Published - 2019

Disciplines

Quantitative, Qualitative, Comparative, and Historical Methodologies

Access to Document

10.1080/14780887.2018.1563270License: Unspecified

Cite this

@article{716a40d71611479092c8593ce3dc8b6f,

title = "Exploring tensions of using interpretative phenomenological analysis in a domain with conflicting cultural practices",

author = "Adam Kirn and Huff, \{James L.\} and Allison Godwin and Monique Ross and Cheryl Cass",

note = "ABSTRACT The philosophical foundations of interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA)-phenomenology, hermeneutics, and idiography-guide its practice and use. However, this foundation is often at odds with cultural practices of disciplines that value post-positivist perspectives emphasizing that reality can be objectively known.",

year = "2019",

doi = "10.1080/14780887.2018.1563270",

language = "American English",

journal = "Qualitative Research in Psychology",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exploring tensions of using interpretative phenomenological analysis in a domain with conflicting cultural practices

AU - Kirn, Adam

AU - Huff, James L.

AU - Godwin, Allison

AU - Ross, Monique

AU - Cass, Cheryl

N1 - ABSTRACT The philosophical foundations of interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA)-phenomenology, hermeneutics, and idiography-guide its practice and use. However, this foundation is often at odds with cultural practices of disciplines that value post-positivist perspectives emphasizing that reality can be objectively known.

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

UR - https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2018.1563270

U2 - 10.1080/14780887.2018.1563270

DO - 10.1080/14780887.2018.1563270

M3 - Article

JO - Qualitative Research in Psychology

JF - Qualitative Research in Psychology

ER -

Exploring tensions of using interpretative phenomenological analysis in a domain with conflicting cultural practices

Disciplines

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this